Logo: N.A.
Name: GigaCommunis
Ticker Symbol: N.A.
Network: Ethereum
Contract Address: 0x947203E20813e4f7757fb2304fd1E34eDC3c4FF9
Purpose: gCOMM is developed as wrapping contract for COMM token. Every 1e9 COMM token equals one gCOMM token.
Project URL: https://app.hexpay.day/1/communis/giga
Project social media: N.A.
Contract Source Code: Link
Audit(s): NIL

REVIEWED BY: CaptainBurningWater

Contract Purpose and Scope:

The GigaCommunis contract facilitates the minting and burning of Giga Communis (gCOMM) tokens, which are ERC20 tokens pegged to another token (COM*). It allows for the conversion of a specified amount of COM tokens into gCOMM tokens and vice versa, with the conversion rate set to 1 gCOMM = 1 Giga COMM. Additionally, the contract includes functionality for managing excess token balances, enabling the trimming of surplus tokens.

Security Considerations:

  1. Access Control: The contract’s design to be accessible to anyone eliminates the need for access control mechanisms.
  2. Data Validation: While certain functions perform basic validations, comprehensive data validation is still important to prevent vulnerabilities. Inputs should be thoroughly validated to prevent integer overflow, underflow, and other potential vulnerabilities.
  3. Gas Limitations: Gas consumption is optimized to ensure efficient transaction processing.
  4. Error Handling: The error handling in the GigaCommunis contract appears to be well-considered and implemented.
  5. Delegatecall and Call: The contract does not directly use delegatecall or call.
  6. Events and Logs: Events are used to log important contract actions, but they could provide more detailed information for better transparency and auditability. Enhance event logging to include relevant details such as transaction IDs, token amounts, and addresses involved. But since this could implicate more gas fees, is understandable that this is reduced.

Code Review:

  1. Code Quality: The code demonstrates good quality overall, with clear function names and logical structure.
  2. Logic Flow: The logic flow is generally straightforward, but certain functions could benefit from additional comments or documentation to clarify their purpose and behavior.
  3. Modularity: The contract exhibits a degree of modularity, with distinct functions for different token operations.
  4. Comments and Documentation: While some functions have inline comments explaining their functionality, comprehensive documentation covering the contract’s design, architecture, and key components would improve readability and facilitate understanding.

Upgradability:

The contract design does not see to support upgradability, which may limit future improvements or enhancements without deploying a new contract.

Notes:

* The original COM (0x5A9780Bfe63f3ec57f01b087cD65BD656C9034A8) only has 1 letter M and at this contract is described as COMM with 2 M’s, but since the logic is assign to the right constant, and is always described in this contract as COMM, there is no real implications, and everything works as intended.

Conclusion:

Overall, the GigaCommunis demonstrates a solid implementation of an ERC20 token with additional functionalities, with a focus on security, efficiency, and user experience. It provides essential functionality for managing gCOMM tokens while mitigating potential risks and vulnerabilities.

B9.xyz IS NOT OPTIMIZED TO BE VIEWED USING THE CURRENT RESOLUTION. IF YOU ARE USING A MOBILE PHONE, PLEASE ROTATE AND USE LANDSCAPE MODE.

Scroll to Top